I'm speaking in general.I see. So all the other posters who are saying this guy burying money in the yard to hide it from the judge so it won't be considered for child support, are they also saying what I'm saying is beyond rationale? All the other posters, 10 pages of it, agreeing that this person is taking the notion of a pre-nup, something I wholly support, beyond what is legal and is openly advocating for hiding assets in anticipation of what he sees as an inevitable divorce, ALL those other people who agree with me, they're saying that too? Tell me, are they in the room with you right now?
Quote EXACTLY what I said that is "beyond rationale." Or stop it.
If this guy is committing acts of fraud to hide assets for a divorce, the judge will come down hard on him.
Nothing wrong with a pre-nup for either party, as somebody coming late to the relationship has no claim on previously obtained assets.