Joined
·
97 Posts
No, I saw a couple YouTubes on it.Have you read "The Boy Crisis" by Warren Farrell, Ph.D. ? By your question, I'm assuming the answer is "no".
No, I saw a couple YouTubes on it.Have you read "The Boy Crisis" by Warren Farrell, Ph.D. ? By your question, I'm assuming the answer is "no".
Right. And I’ve struggled with applying for assistance since my husband died out of shame. I wasn’t raised on it in any fashion, have been working since I was 15 and still work, though I’m the sole provider and care taker of my son and have no family here to lean on.The vast majority of women never get welfare. Instead, most of us work and pay taxes just like men do. And some of those taxes do go to provide welfare to some women.
So they corrected it the 78-79 yearbooks. A section for girls sports and then the real sports section seems correct.The Woodside yearbooks from 1975 through 1977 had two sports sections; one headed BOYS SPORTS and the other headed GIRLS SPORTS. That's fine and dandy. The yearbooks from 1978 and 1979, however, had two sports sections: one headed SPORTS and the other headed GIRLS SPORTS. Why was 1978 such a special year in history to suddenly take BOYS out of high school SPORTS?
Sounds like we basso profondos are left out again. 😉While I’m a strong female, and was forced to lead my household even before my husband died, I will submit to the right man, with the baritone voice and a Godly lead demeanor.
Why does taking MALE terms out of sports somehow make it "real"? I interpret the ungendered sports section to mean coed. They could have conceivably had a girl kicker on the football team for all I know. This same school did have in fact restrooms and locker rooms labeled for both boys and girls, even past the year 1977.So they corrected it the 78-79 yearbooks. A section for girls sports and then the real sports section seems correct.. Sorry couldn't resist.
What insidious means, besides removing the word boy from the yearbooks, would you say is turning the boys who used to fight to the death at the Alamo into the depressed, anxiety ridden, rudderless, suicide commiting boys of the modern day?You missed the much more insidious means that have been used to destroy boys from becoming men.
Government welfare is for CHILDREN, not childless women who can work. So as long as a woman is supporting a man's children, your snarky statement is meaningless.We don't need men. Women have government welfare to provide for them and their babies.
Not to argue but have you seen some welfare moms? That money is NOT going to the kids accept for some boxes of Mac and Cheese.Government welfare is for CHILDREN, not childless women who can work. So as long as a woman is supporting a man's children, your snarky statement is meaningless.
Believe me, I agree. I have even heard of women on the news here giving their Food Stamps to drug dealers!!!Not to argue but have you seen some welfare moms? That money is NOT going to the kids expect for some boxes of Mac and Cheese.
A man once told me that women spread their legs, have babies and ride the welfare waves. Men can't do that.Believe me, I agree. I have even heard of women on the news here giving their Food Stamps to drug dealers!!!
But those weren't the women he was talking about...he was making a blanket statement that women use welfare instead of men, and his comparison doesn't line up. Well, not to my way of thinking. Unless I misunderstood his point.
You and your son will be fine. I raised my sons mostly by myself because their father just wasn't that interested in raising kids and they turned out fine.Right. And I’ve struggled with applying for assistance since my husband died out of shame. I wasn’t raised on it in any fashion, have been working since I was 15 and still work, though I’m the sole provider and care taker of my son and have no family here to lean on.
I don’t just sit back receiving welfare and truly, what I’m receiving is a survivor benefit for my son that my husband worked over 40 years and am rightfully entitled to even though it’s hard for me to swallow some days.
While I can’t teach my son how to be a man, I intend on teaching him by the men I have in our church who have stepped in to fill that needed role as best they can. While I’m a strong female, and was forced to lead my household even before my husband died, I will submit to the right man, with the baritone voice and a Godly lead demeanor. I will also continued to bust my butt working as I do. Don’t lump all us females together.
And I know I said God.. don’t get triggered everyone.
I think men need to be active to be fulfilled. In the past, men lived an agrarian life tilling the soil for a living. It was backbreaking work, but I bet they didn't wonder about how cutting off their junk might solve their problems. I don't think working a 9-5 is the most fulfilling aspect for a man. Cubicles aren't the new corn fields. But they are pervasive, however we were not built that way.What insidious means, besides removing the word boy from the yearbooks, would you say is turning the boys who used to fight to the death at the Alamo into the depressed, anxiety ridden, rudderless, suicide commiting boys of the modern day?