Joined
·
2,488 Posts
The idiocy of today's men that have forgotten their biological imperative is one of the key ingredients on the pussified behavior of so many males in the western world. As a man your biological imperative is to instinctively act to prevent your mate from having sex with another male. Reason why? the avoidance of having to spend your time in life raising another man's child, and not passing on your own genes (which is the ultimate aim). This biological imperative has since the beginning of time been stablished culturally in all societies around this world, even before one group of people began interacting with another group of people.That's what having self respect as man really means. Letting other men define what's acceptable for you and what isn't, not so much.
Now, although males in most of today's societies don't need to worry too much about raising another man's child unbeknown to them due to the medical progresses, which makes females able to not get pregnant with their lover's child, still it happens all the time. Those men wired to accept their woman mating with another male, are supposed by natural selection to be duds, males that are not supposed to pass on their genes and should be avoided, just like humans instinctively avoid procreating with a person that has mental illness because you don't want to chance passing those kind of genes to your progeny. It is a natural selection rejection. It's the reason why "normal" humans reject procreation with an individual that doesn't present the fittest genes to pass on the the next generation.
So, your argument that that's what self respect means is utterly wrong and it seems that you are in the group of humans that have forgotten what it means to be a man, and why to procreate: the continuation of the species by passing on the best suited genes to survive in their environment. We don't worry too much about it in our western world, but in societies were life is still hash, all the biological imperatives still stand; but proud, superior westerners look upon those societies as "primitives". I bet you that in those "primitive" societies, there are not as many crazies as we have in our western world. Take a wild guess why that is?