Of course, and what is wrong with that? I'm sure you do it too. If your spouse insisted on a open marriage would you just accept it or send her packing?
Of course, and what is wrong with that? I'm sure you do it too. If your spouse insisted on a open marriage would you just accept it or send her packing?So my way or the highway then.
Again, so what if it comes from personal insecurities. If the person can't tolerate it, then they are free to break off the relationship. I don't want my wife going out clubbing on a GNO at the local meat market night club. That may come from personal insecurities on my part, but again what does the source matter? It is my boundary. You only have to live with it if you want to be with me.Ask yourself what is the real reason you object to him watching porn and if that reason is due to your possible insecurities and not because you object to porn itself.
It's about having boundaries and keeping to them isn't it. Far too many people come to TAM who have boundaries but who are afraid to stand up for them if their spouses don't. Personally, I won't put up with any nonsense like that. Its SOOO important to find a person who shares your values and never to compromise on that. Never settle for second best.Of course, and what is wrong with that? I'm sure you do it too. If your spouse insisted on a open marriage would you just accept it or send her packing?
I always fully agree with this statement and I am never fully comfortable with it.That may come from personal insecurities on my part, but again what does the source matter? It is my boundary. You only have to live with it if you want to be with me.
You said,I didn't make ANY value judgment. Don't put words into my mouth.
So you have no boundaries in a marriage?I always fully agree with this statement and I am never fully comfortable with it.
I think the source does matter. Perhaps this comes from living with a parent with schizophrenia, but placing boundaries on a spouse that have absolutely no basis in fact, while within a person's rights, should not get carte blanche treatment.
I have no idea how you got that from what I wrote.So you have no boundaries in a marriage?
These are also the same men who think that they have to keep their wives under constant surveillance. There is a reason they believe all women cheat.Amazing that many men who watch porn and lust after loads of women and imagine having sex with them has to believe that all men are exactly the same as them or must be gay. I have no idea why unless its insecurity or guilt? They must believe that all men do it so its ok in their minds. Its total nonsense and very offensive to those men who choose to live differently. Just as all women are different so are men.
I have no idea how you got that from what I wrote.
Of course I have boundaries in my marriage.
You answered a post about each of us having boundaries and sticking to them. You said you weren't comfortable with that statement. No one has to give detailed reasons why they have that boundary, it's just there and its another's decision whether they are ok with it or not.I have no idea how you got that from what I wrote.
Of course I have boundaries in my marriage.
That makes sense, but obviously an extreme case. Mental illness will skew the person's perception of everything. So, maybe a qualifier of, barring any mental illness...I always fully agree with this statement and I am never fully comfortable with it.
I think the source does matter. Perhaps this comes from living with a parent with schizophrenia, but placing boundaries on a spouse that have absolutely no basis in fact, while within a person's rights, should not get carte blanche treatment.
I said that just feeling a certain way might not be a reasonable boundary. The "I just feel that way" defense is insufficient.You answered a post about each of us having boundaries and sticking to them. You said you weren't comfortable with that statement. No one has to give detailed reasons why they have that boundary, it's just there and its another's decision whether they are ok with it or not.
Well, more above. See what you think.That makes sense, but obviously an extreme case. Mental illness will skew the person's perception of everything. So, maybe a qualifier of, barring any mental illness...
They also have to realize that boundaries limit which partners will work for them. There is nothing wrong with having a boundary, but you have to be reasonable.You answered a post about each of us having boundaries and sticking to them. You said you weren't comfortable with that statement. No one has to give detailed reasons why they have that boundary, it's just there and its another's decision whether they are ok with it or not.
This is all I'm saying.They also have to realize that boundaries limit which partners will work for them. There is nothing wrong with having a boundary, but you have to be reasonable.
I think you’re getting a little carried away here and doing your best to making it into something dirty and bad.Amazing that many men who watch porn and lust after loads of women and imagine having sex with them has to believe that all men are exactly the same as them or must be gay. I have no idea why unless its insecurity or guilt? They must believe that all men do it so its ok in their minds. Its total nonsense and very offensive to those men who choose to live differently. Just as all women are different so are men.
Maybe it is a matter of terms.Maybe we're quibbling over terms.
I am saying that biological attraction and desire are too intertwined to separate. If I see a beautiful woman on the street, it doesn't mean that I immediately start trying to concoct ways of getting her into the bedroom. It doesn't mean that I get an erection, or engage in a long fantasy about our not-for-prime-time-sexual-escapades.
It means that I might say to myself "under the right circumstances, I could see myself having sex with that woman, and enjoying it". Then definitely NOT turning around for another look, and NOT making my partner in any way aware of this fleeting thought.
Edit: I'm also pretty sure that I have no interest in mentally policing myself over decades to erase a perfectly natural and useful evolutionary thought. I'm defined by what I DO.