Why do you object to him getting a motorcycle?
He feels that you are controlling him. You two need marriage and financial counseling to learn how to deal with this issue.Yes, he did say just that, on several occasions. He understands that it is not the best way to go about things, but also that he "deserves" it and that he doesn't care.
This is extremely important yet you left it out of your initial post.There are also a lot of other issues surrounding the situation at hand: name-calling, destruction of property, etc etc that I won't get detailed about, but they cause the situation to be more loaded than it sounds.
Honestly, the motorcycle is not an issue. You had the money and he should be able to have a motor cycle if it’s important to him.I don't think he has PTSD or anything from deployments, but I do think that the nature of his job, peer-group, etc has caused some anger management problems. He explodes, and then blames me. I've told him that it's his brain that fills up with anger, and therefore, it is his anger to manage. It is not my job to manage it for him. Of course, he won't go to anger management counseling. Not sure if it shows up on his security clearances or not, but there's definitely a stigma attached to it.
Thanks for pointing out that you are playing devil's advocate; for a second, I wasn't quite sure...
This doesn't sound like money's the real issue here....to "put me in my place." ...
...
I would rather just have a kind husband that doesn't assert his dominance in such dramatic ways.
...
He threatens divorce and does things like this to shut me down.
...
...just to "punish" me for disagreeing with him. He does this frequently...
While we're reversing the roles, are we allowing the wife to put the husband in his place? To punish him?Guy gets shot at for a living, comes home to a wife that tries to control where he spends the money he earned? The same money that is paying for her education? Did i got that right?
Reverse the roles in this. Imagine a woman that works and her husband goes to school. She wants to buy something with the money she earned and he says no, because he knows better what to do with the money SHE is earning!
Is this acceptable? If not, why? And how is this different?
It's not like you're starving or anything. There was enough to go around and take even some more to make it even.